Show newer

(this is because replacing flawed systems requires working with and talking to people, which is incompatible with the image of programmer-as-egoistic-man that the modern discipline is founded upon)

Show thread

software people love to be like “i wonder how much of a computer i could build from scratch” and then direct approximately 0% of that competency into replacing the flawed systems we all use everyday

@coriander i mean they’re probably right, in the sense that except for nostalgia there is absolutely no reason to make another ghostbusters movie, but i would simply choose not to make them instead

@alyssa (so, no i don’t know of any cases, but moreover i don’t know HOW we would know)

@alyssa i think this is a difficult question to answer because frequently we only know about these things because someone considered it distinctive enough to remark upon, which is usually not the case for ordinary allophones

much of our knowledge about historical phonology comes from things like poetry, but oftentimes poetic rhyming conflates various allophones (and if it doesn’t, that’s an argument in favour of the sounds being distinctive)

so “people used to say this a few different ways, but that variety vanished without consequence once the conditioning environment shifted” is something there is likely to be zero historical record of (except in the past maybe hundred years where people have started getting really rigorous about recording dialect and phonological systems exactly)

@alyssa corollary here is that oftentimes it is the fact that there are distinct allophones which ALLOWS the bit of surrounding context to be safely discarded, because the allophones are now conveying whatever information the (usually more verbose) preceding thing was doing

@alyssa generally, because auditory communication is lossy, and the more information you can convey to help disambiguate the better

the more sounds you have, the fewer words have each sound, and the easier it is to select which word you’re hearing

this comes at a cost, which is why mergers also happen, but oftentimes the distinction is useful or even necessary, so it sticks around

(it would be a big problem if “like” and “lick” became homophones in English just because we no longer say the final E, as an extreme example)

for a girl who supposedly listens to a lot of music i’ve never seen æsc make a playlist

yes we do live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and yes that means elections are necessarily elections of the most favourable enemy

but it’s a mistake to characterize this fact of history as a feature which is essential to democracy

it is only a feature essential to our present democracy

Show thread

voting is only about “choosing your opponent” because we live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie

imagining a web focused on people's indie content 

@akjcv (i’ll be doing the first part myself to publish my own bookmarks at some point, but i’m not interested in building indexers or search engines)

imagining a web focused on people's indie content 

@akjcv surely if 1 can be done by hand then it can be done by machines

so i’d start by figuring out how to do 1 by hand and then focus on building 2 and 3

integrations to automate 1 can be done later

@jamey just want to say for the record that “Call Me Maybe” into “Poker Face” is an EXCELLENT transition

@aescling no song which samples “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger” could ever top “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger”

@aescling no, Discovery samples tracks from the crates not from Top 40

the 00’s were all about people releasing good songs and other people then taking that and using it as a sample in a much worse song

Show older
📟🐱 GlitchCat

A small, community‐oriented Mastodon‐compatible Fediverse (GlitchSoc) instance managed as a joint venture between the cat and KIBI families.