Show newer

more money:
• can make games faster and cheaper
• can sell games to people who can’t afford $70/game and thus reach a wider audience
• GBA games are better and so should sell better
• GBA games are better and so will drive merchandising opportunities more than switch games
• lower development barriers = more exclusive third-party titles, driving sales

less money:
• GBA games are worse for performative gaming (streaming) and so have less cultural cachet
• the price of games is so disconnected from the costs of producing them that anything you can do to make charging $70 justified is worth it
• can't cash in on ports of iOS games
• most gamers only buy prestige games meaning they won’t consider anything cheap or technically simple

Show thread

if nintendo pivoted to rereleasing the game boy advance and developing comparatively low-budget, easy-to-develop games and selling them for $30 apiece, they would make

@akjcv and in this market $450 over three years is a lot better option than $300 for one

@akjcv i feel like if you can earn $300k for one year you can probably earn $150k every year for the rest of your life somewhere a lot better

@akjcv i don't know what this email subject line means so this wouldn't work on me

@djsundog i get that existing fans might be willing to pay but they're not making any new ones like this

@djsundog hard to find a reason to care about the team when they're not the local team being carried by the local station anymore tho tbh

@djsundog and the college sports teams have all moved to college league specific networks which require a cable package or separate streaming subscription!

@djsundog when i lived in WA i was far enough from seattle to get the spokane side of things and it still seemed like a thing there, but now that i live near a major city there is just No Local Programming despite the ostensibly more populous market area

so local tv just died while i wasn’t looking huh

re: antagonism 

@wallhackio this poll proved prescient

my take is that perhaps we can criticize the united states for its ethical and moral failings WITHOUT needing to fall back on a tired argument where it is singularly responsible for the actions of other nations and other world leaders, as tho its purpose in society is to be both the ethical rule and the peacekeeper/enforcer of geopolitical events and the rest of the world is but a current or potential colony that gets a bit unruly sometimes, sometimes with permission and sometimes without

Show thread

oh are we attributing and analysing international events as though they were solely orchestrated by the leaders of the united states and maybe, at best, a couple of specially designated enemies there·of in their eternal struggle for the fate of the universe again

aspiring to bourgeois levels of luxury isn’t very “end the american empire” of you

Show thread

look leftists, when you say “in a world where i am no longer plagued by capitalism, i would ⸺”, we all know that you are just spraypainting the american dream with a mildly progressive patina. you’re not selling revolution to anyone here

re: all caps 

@aescling @Satsuma @wallhackio i thought you had a good time at food not bombs

Show older
📟🐱 GlitchCat

A small, community‐oriented Mastodon‐compatible Fediverse (GlitchSoc) instance managed as a joint venture between the cat and KIBI families.