Lady @Lady@cat.family

@KitRedgrave it's called xml

@hazel why does this poll only have one option (not counting spiderman)

suppose the inventors of porygon designed it based on professor laventon’s descriptions

contender for dialogue in a Zelda/Impa fanfiction

> So you’re not girlfriends?
< Uhh…
> Well, are you friends?
< Yes, of course.
> And you’re not girls.
< Not per se, no.
> So you’re not girlfriends?
< Uhh…

The GlitchCat #SundayPost offers news and updates from our corner of the fediverse to yours.

§ From Our Users :—

• @Satsuma and @Lady have beeen watching ‘Guardian’ (cdrama) at a very slow pace of one episode a week (in a discord group with some other folks).

• @Lady also published a pornographic pokémon oneshot, but I’m not sharing the link to that here so you’ll have to be enterprising if you really want to read it.

• @Lady also also has been working more on her indie website publishing workflows but there haven’t been any real releases of anything yet.

@wikipediahaiku no don't do it

it's a trap

@alyssa @gaditb and i am a poor orphan

@alyssa @gaditb but what if they're all rich property owners

@alyssa @gaditb i mean i knock out innocent civilians before stealing from them so that my reputation doesn't take a hit……

but by game standards apparently nobody cares so…?

@gaditb @alyssa i mean i'm treating it as a term of art and not an actual indication of goodness or evilness because yes i don't believe in individualist frameworks for moral judgment

@gaditb see like if you want to bring in mechanics it becomes very clear, in baldur's gate there is a reputation mechanic where if you help people they like you and give you good stuff

the (smart) self-serving "evil" approach IS to work on behalf of social good because it uplifts everybody (and definitely you)

@alyssa @gaditb very simply i think chairman mao is lawful evil and i think that is in fact the maoist position to take

@alyssa @gaditb oh because i don't believe moral good is a property of people but of actions and systems, and the actions and systems which provide the most benefit for the oppressed happen to be (perhaps definitionally?) good ones

@gaditb see the question which started this discussion was what alignment i pick for my baldur's gate character so i needed a definite answer

(i wasn't framing good and evil as non-opposites i was just using them with multiple meanings; the adjectival “good/evil” was morally good/evil, while the nominal “good/evil” was good/evil according to the d&d alignment system; i do not equivalate these)

@gaditb (by poststructuralists i mean foucaultians and similar who oppose biopower/necropower/colonialism but don't view power relations as escapable)

@gaditb but actions which "control others" and "improve the lives of others" aren't mutually exclusive, and in fact every lawful character has an aim of controlling others regardless of alignment

it sounds like you want to say that if it improves the lives of others at all, it is good, and it's only evil if it never does, and i don't think that's a balanced framing