@gaditb if you're going to cover the fediverse and you haven't read imagining transgender by david valentine go do that first
📟🐱 GlitchCat Sunday Post, 05 February 2023
I think the more relevant update for @Satsuma is that the tangerine is back in its normal timezone
📟🐱 GlitchCat Sunday Post, 05 February 2023
The GlitchCat #SundayPost offers news and updates from our corner of the fediverse to yours.
§ From Our Users :—
• @Satsuma and @Lady have beeen watching ‘Guardian’ (cdrama) at a very slow pace of one episode a week (in a discord group with some other folks).
• @Lady also published a pornographic pokémon oneshot, but I’m not sharing the link to that here so you’ll have to be enterprising if you really want to read it.
• @Lady also also has been working more on her indie website publishing workflows but there haven’t been any real releases of anything yet.
@wikipediahaiku no don't do it
it's a trap
d&d alignments
@gaditb see like if you want to bring in mechanics it becomes very clear, in baldur's gate there is a reputation mechanic where if you help people they like you and give you good stuff
the (smart) self-serving "evil" approach IS to work on behalf of social good because it uplifts everybody (and definitely you)
d&d alignments
@gaditb see the question which started this discussion was what alignment i pick for my baldur's gate character so i needed a definite answer
(i wasn't framing good and evil as non-opposites i was just using them with multiple meanings; the adjectival “good/evil” was morally good/evil, while the nominal “good/evil” was good/evil according to the d&d alignment system; i do not equivalate these)
d&d alignments
@gaditb (by poststructuralists i mean foucaultians and similar who oppose biopower/necropower/colonialism but don't view power relations as escapable)
d&d alignments
@gaditb but actions which "control others" and "improve the lives of others" aren't mutually exclusive, and in fact every lawful character has an aim of controlling others regardless of alignment
it sounds like you want to say that if it improves the lives of others at all, it is good, and it's only evil if it never does, and i don't think that's a balanced framing
d&d alignments
@gaditb my point is, i definitely recognize that
fascist / capitalist / ancap
are evil archetypes. but i'm not convinced that
tankie / poststructuralist / ancom
are not ALSO evil archetypes. but like, in a good way
d&d alignments
@gaditb under your definitions, the good neutral evil character understands that material conditions are such that their aims are most achievable when people work together in solidarity over shared mutual interest. they do not care about “helping people” in the abstract, but materially, they believe that a mass perspective will do better for them than a perspective of individualism and manipulation. it so happens that a mass perspective is also, materially, what is best for people in general
does it really matter whether you are organizing a union because you are a disempowered worker who wants more power, or if you are organizing a union because you want what is best for society? in the end, disempowered workers getting more power IS what is best for society
d&d alignments
@gaditb so you think what distinguishes good (d&d alignment) from evil (d&d alignment) is ends and not means
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.
For the time being, this is mostly a mirror of <https://status.ladys.computer/>. Want to get in touch? E·mail me!