it’s really obvious from like a few seconds which moderators actually care about the safety of the people here, and which moderators care about cultivating a certain kind of liberal space or discussion platform with no considerations made for the fundamental vulnerabilities of being human, or not Enough for them to sacrifice their perfect vision of Liberalism in favour of actual measures to protect users
if your posts are indistinguishable from that of a CIA plant trying to sow controversy and foil collective action, maybe consider making different posts
the kind of idle linkfollowing which people now see as relegated to sites like Wikipedia or TVTropes was once how the entire internet operated
for people who are white and Protestant and who never had any humanities training, i wonder how familiar they are with that situation. i wonder what their response is to it
i of course have had the experience of reading an article where the author is responding to like 5 different intellectual currents that i am not familiar with and consequently gleaning only like 20% of their message from it as a result. i still had to write papers on those articles
if you have not spent a lot of time reading similar things and encountering similar situations, your worldview probably does not look like mine and i understand that this is why my blog will never be popular
i have now posted about copyright and software versioning so i guess i have a real tech blog
Suggestive versioning
Copyright and commons
it 404s trying to load en-ca.js, which is presumably supposed to be localization data, and then the whole thing breaks
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.