clodsfire @wallhackio@cat.family

@maple i like fruit but i do not like olives so im not sure this is true

@aescling @monorail temporarily hostile

@aescling @monorail ow who hit me

@coriander java chip frap in small doses is pretty good imo

@monorail fuck

@Lady @aescling @Satsuma @monorail i do

@monorail can electric kettle users interact 🥺

@coriander here is some help

@coriander damn

@coriander i will take the beast off your hands, if he is being too weird.

@Lady hell yeah

@aescling yeah

can i get a yeehaw

@coriander this is actually a good reason, so i forgive you

@coriander 1

monads are...

@amy there is another article with the segment:

'In the summarization task, we provide the prompt “Summarize the Wikipedia page on monads in bullet-point form.” to ChatGPT and GPT-UGRD. It is obvious that summarizing the imaginary concept of a “monad” is a fool’s errand. Consequently, model performance is measured by calculating the number of tokens that comprise the summary generated by each model, with fewer tokens being better, as it would be pathological for a model to waste valuable compute in attempting to summarize an imaginary concept that cannot hurt anyone.'

if it didnt imply the writer was interacting with AI i would have guessed @Lady wrote this

@aescling @amy would they publish battlefield 1 wonkery

@Lady @aescling it's mostly some of the regrettable consequences of the early specification, like how non-anonymous function declarations at top level are added to the global scope, or eval, or the constructor function nonsense, or the Function constructor, == shenanigans, etc

i am a javascript apologist i love the language it is my baby, but what is a baby if not something with some shit in its diaper?

@Lady @aescling i do not understand what you are understanding me to have said