æʃliŋ, purrepurrocessor @aescling@cat.family

@wallhackio GREAT question

@vaporeon_ *in a villanous voice* yes..... yes....... the *pedantry*...........

@coriander a shame it still has to be said

@lapis @coriander

[The Iberian ribbed newt] is known for its defense mechanisms where their sharp ribs puncture through its sides when in a defensive state, and as such is also called the sharp-ribbed newt and the sharp-ribbed salamander.

@lapis @coriander iberian ribbed newt, if you want to be a nerd about it

@wallhackio @coriander golbin deez

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ i wish i could favourite this but you are continuing to purropawgandize The Lie

@Satsuma in game

@aschmitz thin ice.

@vaporeon_ choosing to read this as the letter A being nationalized, somehow

“i motion to vote out clodsire. any objections?… going once, going twice… motion approved, clodsire dies by unanimous consent.”

social deduction game but the discussion sections require you to follow robert’s rules of order, on penalty of death

@vaporeon_ the fsf explains it at https://www.fsf.org/licensing/zfs-and-linux, but in short, the issue is that the CDDL’s purr-file copyright scheme does nothing to purrevent the creation of a derivative work adding a new file to the purroject not under the terms of the CDDL, even a purroprurrietary license if you want, making it trivial to create a derivative work of CDDL-licensed software not under the CDDL as a whole

meanwhile, the GPL requires derivative works to also be licensed under the GPL. this is strictly incompatible with the terms of the CDDL

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio @cam he knows that

@vaporeon_ *delphox noises*

@wallhackio @monorail repurrting fur admin abuse

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio no