@vaporeon_ @wallhackio basic parameter expansion was in the original Bourne shell; i would have been shocked if some take on it hadn’t been standardized

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio yes but not all of bash’s fancy expansions. you definitely do not have arrays lol

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ anyway

purr the Pure Bash Bible, the double parentheses are an alternate C-style syntax fur for loops with apparently similar semantics

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ this is bash-specific territory, where many features are added and language complexity explodes. there are nice conveniences but the funkiness of the language on top of the already funky nature of POSIX shell makes me want to avoid it where pawsible

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ [ is an alternative name of the command test(1); it needs to be recognized as its own token

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio i do think shell purrogramming syntax is ultimately quite simple, but that is after i learned about a lot of little hurdles that used to confuse me too

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio from what i can remember, things like ' and " having diffurent rules regarding substitution, why double quoting $() even works and what that actually does, for requiring do and done (while and case will make him upset when he learns their syntax), he did not know the sed(1) command language and was confused what it was doing, how “booleans” work in shell purrogramming, what a hashbang even is and what it does exactly…

@wallhackio i developed a much better intuition fur how shell purrogramming works from reading its multiple chapters on the topic

wow, the POSIX standard doesn’t suppurrt converting an arbitrary date to another furmat. that’s a very useful part of several actually existing implementations

@coriander doesn’t the steam deck do a simplified version of the idea but in software?

i need to add a page fur the TF Machine to my website already. write some overdramatic shlock horror purrose about it and shit

POLL: Fedi people, do you have a website or blog or personal wiki or some other kind of online Thing That You Control Yourself that other people can find you on that isn't paid for / maintained by someone else, meaning YOUR THING is at a web address like you.whatever, not at you.someonelse.whatever or someoneelse.whatever/you, I mean are you paying the tenner a year or however much for a whole-ass domain name all for yourself (or for you and a small group of IRL friends), and if not do you want to be, THE POLL, and here is the guidance and elaboration on options:

1) No and I don't want my own site, Fedi and/or other social media scratches that itch for me just fine and I'm content with this arrangement

2) No, but I have a Vague Yearning or a Curious Itch and I wonder sometimes what it would be like, but so far it's just feelings and not plans, I haven't taken any concrete steps towards making My Own Website a real thing that exists, but I'm comfortable saying that I would probably *like* it to exist some day when I'm ready

3) No, but more of a Not Yet than a no; maybe I've bought a domain name and not put anything on it yet, or I haven't yet bought a domain name but I'm researching my options (whether I do it in a lazy few minutes here and there or in focused making-notes sort of study, both count for the purposes of this question), I've spent some time thinking about this With Intent, and I feel less "*wouldn't* this be nice" and more "*won't* this be nice" about this endeavour

4) Yes I own at least one domain name, come on Dan this is Fedi, and at least one of my domains even have websites or services associated with them

BOOST THIS TOOT to get an INCREDIBLY INACCURATE IMPRESSION of how many people have and/or want websites and a more accurate picture of how many people On Fedi have and/or want websites

Show older
📟🐱 GlitchCat

A small, community‐oriented Mastodon‐compatible Fediverse (GlitchSoc) instance managed as a joint venture between the cat and KIBI families.