Show newer

RTF

i don’t actually think it’s necessary that every person share the same story of what happened, or that any of those stories actually be objectively true

okay but surely one of the reasons why there are so many similarities between the internet of today and the internet of the 90’s is because the 90’s weren’t that long ago

there’s no way an actual engineer wrote this blog post right

Show thread

« My task was to enable the chat to recognize a user’s project dependencies, allowing it to provide magical answers when the user poses a question. » just what every software engineer loves… magic…

Show thread

github i don’t care that you keep trying to get me to use your shitty a·i software but it is very concerning to me as a user of your product that you keep talking about how YOUR ENGINEERS use your shitty a·i software

Stellar type but instead of terastallization it’s @aescling with all the vees

also Open Doors is a bad program with negative value⹀add over just plain archive.org Wayback Machine backups and does not in any way deserve the adjective “preservation”

Show thread

in case it needs to be said regarding their latest fundraising drive, A·O·3 is doing less than nothing when it comes to keeping my specific fanworks safe

my girlfriend has very cute, kissable lips 💋

roark: while you were sitting at home reading comic books, i was studying the blade

hobby: watching the pokémon anime and pointing out all the C·O·T·D’s who are definitely fucking their pokémon

there’s plenty of tech thinkpiecing right now which is like “if a web scraper uses libxml2 to process web pages does that mean that contributing to libxml2 is being complicit in web scraping” and i don’t buy that, i think (1) the people who are complicit in the web scraping are the people providing the physical infrastructure (machines, wires, electricity) required to carry it out, and (2) libxml2 isn’t even that good, and the fact that the web scrapers can Just Use It instead of writing their own XML parser might save them a little bit of time and intellectual work in the short term, but in the long term they would just write their own XML parser, it’s not like nobody knows how to do that, secrecy regarding the methods and computer code is not a meaningful impediment

programmers seem very committed in the present moment to thinking of code as concrete and material but infrastructure as abstract and ephemeral and i would like to suggest that maybe that is exactly backwards

Show thread

this isn’t like, a particularly principled stance, because ultimately i think that the bulk of the ethical responsibility for computers lies at the feet of the people providing the computers, and not at the feet of some randos who wrote a software library that someone else decided to run on the computers, but also, no i do not want to make those software platforms i disagree with strongly on a philosophical level Better

Show thread

honestly i’ve found bugs or at least Problems in ruby or rails or whatever before and come up with workarounds but i will never submit a patch upstream because do you realize what people use rails to Do

X·M·L was right to mandate that lesthan be written < everywhere

Show thread

parsing is just so much more complicated when you can't tell immediately if a curly brace is opening an object or just a literal curly brace in a string

Show thread

i want a data interchange format like Json but which doesn't allow meaningful markup characters inside quoted strings. does this exist. i mean aside from X·M·L

Show older
📟🐱 GlitchCat

A small, community‐oriented Mastodon‐compatible Fediverse (GlitchSoc) instance managed as a joint venture between the cat and KIBI families.