i think what i actually want is :—
• A GitWeb instance
• A number of users which only have git access, and only to repositories they own
• A straightforward means of getting new repositories (and corresponding subdomains) allocated to users [this can probably just be manual, on request]
• A post-receive hook in every repository which, if the repository has a file named Makefile or GNUmakefile, clones the repository and then runs `make install DESTDIR=public`, serving the contents of the resulting `public` directory from a corresponding subdomain
• Maybe a small amount of allowable additional server configurations besides
trying to negotiate dual feelings of “ugh why are you listening to this bourgeois thinkfluencer and not real organizations of real labourers” and “actually, this person owns approximately zero of the necessary means for any of their labours”
i’m thinking of like, professional speakers and high⹀end consultants here, to be clear; professions where social pressures demand bourgeois hires despite it not actually being a bourgeois role
anyway i would argue translation is fair use insofar as “the copyright holder” is not engaged or interested in producing or licencing a translation of their own but consult your lawyer on that
remembering when i was at a library tech conference in october and an archives guy was like “i would love to get sued because at least then i might learn who took the photograph”
Wikipedia claims peter and the wolf was formerly in the public domain but placed back under copyright by Golan v. Holder—who is the copyright holder tho?
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.