Lady @Lady@cat.family

@aescling you made the poll

@coriander when i first read this i assumed it was written by a man but actually i don’t know if men are capable of tags like “poor pent up boy / evil curious girl” so perhaps i’m wrong https://archiveofourown.org/works/21207125

@alyssa i would probably chop it up and put it in eggs or pilaf

i know i’ve had ham soups which were decent but i couldn’t tell you what the other ingredients were

@Satsuma @platypus trees are also good in the sense of providing a buffer between humans and fast-moving vehicles without compromising visibility; i keep telling satsu that i think Wilmington needs to tear up its streetside parking and replace it with a green zone

@akjcv@types.pl @haskal getting a roomette is more expensive but if you're sharing it and factor in the free meals and accommodations it’s not THAT much more expensive and very nice…

@aescling @akjcv@types.pl javascript isn’t actually a Lisp because code you write today on your machine will work tomorrow on someone else’s, but the fact remains that most of the people writing Javascript compilers and optimizers actually hate core features of the language

@aescling @akjcv@types.pl oh i was talking about proper tail calls (only implemented in Safari), Symbol.species (trying to be removed by Chromium), and all the stuff TypeScript implicitly leaves out in order to be remotely sensible as a language

@aescling @akjcv@types.pl evidence that javascript is just a weird lisp grows

@akjcv@types.pl “Finally, a Lisp compiler that does what it should...”

“It […] contains many known bugs. Not everything is fully implemented.”

maybe a little too on-the-nose…

@akjcv@types.pl ah, the ruby of lisps