sherclod holmes @wallhackio@cat.family

@aescling @monorail @coriander cygwin deez nuts

@holly @monorail reported.

@monorail I am an ls and cd expert, no one does it like me

_{(^O^)/ (^O^)/ (^O^)/} ^{ฅ(^•ﻌ•^ฅ)}

_{(^O^)/ (^O^)/ (^O^)/} ^:3

@coriander wow seems they were right not to diagnose you

@coriander are you one of those supposed "undiagnosed adhd people"

@vaporeon_ @aescling boooooooooooooooooooooooo glitchcat STINKS

@coriander unfortunately battlefield 6 looks really fun

@aescling @vaporeon_ I wanted to use a caret to look like an arrow pointing at me previous post but this happened instead

@aescling @vaporeon_ ^javascript warning

@aescling @vaporeon_ this is a better resource: https://logeion.uchicago.edu/pes

@holly never mind you've won me over

@vaporeon_ if google translate can be trusted it is "pes"

@holly delete this

I am normal and can be trusted to engage reasonably with C++ value categories

@ferret what are those words?

@Satsuma I could just hack a word using quasi. Or I learned that the word "fere" in latin means closely/quite. So I could use ferevisible, ferelocatable, fereidentifiable

@vaporeon_ it would better to say "usually identifiable" or "usually locatable"

let's say, to describe an picture of a face taken for facial recognition software. the software will very likely correctly identify somebody from a clear image of their face, but not always

@Satsuma I am trying to invent taxonomy so a snappy name is better