Show newer

I am normal and can be trusted to engage reasonably with C++ value categories

@Satsuma I could just hack a word using quasi. Or I learned that the word "fere" in latin means closely/quite. So I could use ferevisible, ferelocatable, fereidentifiable

@vaporeon_ it would better to say "usually identifiable" or "usually locatable"

let's say, to describe an picture of a face taken for facial recognition software. the software will very likely correctly identify somebody from a clear image of their face, but not always

@Satsuma I am trying to invent taxonomy so a snappy name is better

@vaporeon_ I know you speak other languages, is there a word in some language you know of that has this meaning?

Show thread

Is there a word in the english dictionary that means "usually visible"?

@aescling @vaporeon_ that is why I put it in quotes. unfortunately people actually say things like this

@vaporeon_ language evolves over time. at the time C was released it was a high level language, and writing in assembly would have been considered writing in a low level language. nowadays it is extraordinarily rare to write things explicitly in assembly--most programmers who work "directly with the hardware" use languages like C, C++, Rust, etc. So the meaning of low-level has changed to refer to usage of languages like those mentioned.

should i add a sherclod holmes sprite to wplace

re: Soaking 

@lapis maybe it's just me but the diagram for the wikipedia article for "Soaking (sexual practice)" is extremely funny to me

ah yes hbomberguy, the only good drama youtuber

it is hot and sweaty outside and not in a sexy way

@packetcat I'm very sorry but I originally read "romantasy" as "romantussy" and now you have to have that in your head too

Show older
📟🐱 GlitchCat

A small, community‐oriented Mastodon‐compatible Fediverse (GlitchSoc) instance managed as a joint venture between the cat and KIBI families.