we know from Drama that Times writers and editors are given very strict guidelines on how they can cover this stuff, but it’s not like journalists don’t know what’s going on or how to get a message across
reading New York Times coverage right now is wild because they’re forced to interview and use the language of some combination of {out⹀of⹀touch old white man} and {staunch Zionist who thinks any criticism of a certain country in the Middle East is an attack on Jews everywhere} and then you get to the part of the article where they state Facts and they’re like “yeah conservative Jewish student organizations have been actively trying to invade encampments and picking fights with these protesters for weeks despite them mostly just barricading themselves in one place, and that’s where all the violence is coming from”
« “I used to joke that the same student might be able to burn down a Bank of America branch in 1970 and still successfully sign on as an executive trainee at Bank of America in 1971,” said Rick Perlstein, a historian who has chronicled midcentury American politics.
“Today, anxiety about achieving economic security after graduation is far more pressing,” he added. “The consequences for identification and arrest are, simply, much greater.” »
the thing is, i mean, the other thing, is if you really think that the tools and technologies which made the web great never left us, why do you speak about the death of the web as primarily a technological phenomenon? if we have the tools, but have all collectively decided to stop using them, surely there is something else going on? something important?
it was your apathy that got us in this situation, and now you think you can save us from it? you, who can’t even properly name what was lost
no, career internet user, the people who made the internet good are not you
the people who made the internet good are not here anymore, and you can not bring them back
do you really think you and the people who read your bland {career internet user}⹀level takes are a workable substitute?
i’m tired of career internet users posting thinkpieces like “the internet used to be good! now it’s bad! we can make it good again!”
no, you can’t, an essay in three parts :—
• you say the internet was good? what made it good? more importantly, WHO?
• what happened to those people?
• what is stopping that from happening to those people again?
Happy May Day 🌹! Are you a furry (or furry‐adjacent) ? Are you a lesbian, or trans(‐adjacent‐)fem(me)
? Do you have a website which you would like to be listed on the public internet, in a directory of other websites by people with those qualities 🌐?
@aescling and I recently launched a new website for serving this purpose! Visit <https://the.awoo.directory/> to see it for yourself, and let me know if you would like your page to be added!
there’s a lot you CAN say about games but like. why would you. it has ceased to be relevant
*slowly turns towards the nearest movie theatre*
remember when games were worth criticizing?! it was like a five year window you probably missed it
the music WAS better when i was a kid! the shows were more creative! the movies were better written, shot and directed! this is extremely distressing to me!
it’s the best you can do as far as supporting “easy”, “low effort” pagination but the drawbacks are still pretty significant and doing the harder more cumbersome thing just seems a lot more preferable to me right now
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.