not to mention the fact that your concept of “justice” is necessarily made problematic by your subjectivity and that your concept of care is, in fact, imposing an agenda
a social justice, a justice which represents the alignment of carer and cared in a social relationship, necessitates an alignment of agenda between them, an alignment which we might term solidarity
if you (anarchist) have a theory which depends on loving and caring for every other person all the time in order to treat them justly i ain’t doing that
« In abstraction, however, and separated from the remaining sphere of human activities and turned into final and sole ends, they are animal functions. »
(thinking of ec.gc.ca right now, or Environment Canada dot Government of Canada dot Canada
thankfully this is now a redirect although it survives in email addresses)
« Apart from this mediation, objects lose their value. They have value only insofar as they REPRESENT it while originally it appeared that the mediation would have value only insofar as IT represents OBJECTS. »
however this is not to say that the freeing of the source code is not an important step, in that it weakens the hold of big business on technology and enables workers to organize separately
the important insight is that this freedom is merely a transitional stepping-point, not an end goal
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.