on the other hand like half of the games have been retconned out of existence so there's that
there are a few fixed reference points and a lot of relative references which mostly link up with those fixed reference points and not much wiggle-room besides
i do not think the pokémon company has a timeline which is as good as my galaxy-brained pokémon timeline but the numbers do keep working out pretty nicely which is good
me: i wonder if the child game character which shares a name with this adult anime CotD could conceivably be the same person if you slot them into their respective locations in the timeline
me after doing some quick maths: oh my god (a) it works and (b) i am ancient
if i stretch it and say she was at the upper age limit for a Picnicker (Trainer Class) in January of 2011 then i can probably get away with having her birthday be in 1999
@gaditb (that work is here: <https://github.com/marrus-sh/MarketCommons2-Ecmascript>)
@gaditb the goal for version 2 is to make it generic across XML and use it as a DSL for various XML-based formats
i have the "generic" part done but haven't finished the "rewrite the parser in javascript" part
@gaditb i do do that mostly haha but there's https://github.com/marrus-sh/MarketCommons-Racket
the repo is archived because i've been working on a much more powerful v2 but it's a bit stalled at the moment
@gaditb are you aware that i created a Not Markdown because, same
@gaditb @jalefkowit@octodon.social @aparrish like descriptively, MDN is first and foremost an instructional resource. its job is to get people writing correct HTML quickly. it's not to explain why things are the way they are
is that the correct mission? should there be more room for the other stuff? 🤷🏻♀️
@gaditb @aparrish @jalefkowit@octodon.social mm i think this is where the plurality of the HTML spec comes into play
for AUTHORS, the HTML spec is meant as a style guide for “good, proper HTML”. it's prescriptive, not descriptive. so they are saying “use A for X; use B for Y” not “A means X; B means Y”.
for IMPLEMENTERS, the HTML spec takes on a descriptive role. but there are no implementation requirements on these elements aside from the default stylesheet; from the perspective of an implementation, <b>/<i> aren’t required to mean anything.
anyway see https://tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/CO.html#COHQ if you want an example of an actually good, consistent, and semantic methodology for marking this stuff up; HTML is pretty far from being actually semantic markup in fact
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.