re: WHAT’S NEW IN UNICODE 16.0?
Unicode originally designated these characters, proposed in 2023, for a 17.0 release, which is a frankly glacial pace and i’m glad people succeeded in getting them to move it up
WHAT’S NEW IN UNICODE 16.0?
most importantly to me personally, Unicode 16.0 comes with U+A7DA LATIN CAPITAL LETTER LAMBDA, U+A7DB LATIN SMALL LETTER LAMBDA, and U+A7DC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER LAMBDA WITH STROKE
these letters are siblings to the long‐encoded character, U+019B LATIN SMALL LETTER LAMBDA WITH STROKE. they originate with an American phoneticist notation and are used as part of the orthographies for many Salishan and Wakashan languages, spoken in the Pacific Northwest
see the proposal for more details: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23191-three-latin-additions.pdf
if you ever go to a Mexican restaurant/fast food place and they *don't* sell Jarritos as a drink option, don't eat there fr fr
@packetcat and like, to be clear, all the worst critics of mastodon? they’re mastodon users. we make fun of other people who go after the software not because they’re critical, but because they haven’t spent enough time here to know where to throw stones. this has always been the case.
same wasn’t true on cohost. people spending time there were nurturing delusion, not honing a critical mindset. and that’s partially because unlike mastodon, on cohost there was absolutely nothing you could do to make things better. the ship was doomed.
@packetcat the thing that tempers my sympathy is these people knew this was the end. the writing was on the wall for most of its existence. folks actively turned away from reason and nurtured a cult mentality when they promoted that space.
they could have invested that social energy elsewhere. mastodon genuinely did miss their absence.
@packetcat oh absolutely, it’s a major service you’re providing and i think you deserve everything good which comes your way
the reality tho is that helping people never makes that kind of money because helping people is not the goal of capitalism. and personally i find it inspiring that some people go and do that work anyway, even though they aren’t getting paid what they should, because those are the kinds of people who live lives of service and make community possible
but some people don’t see that inspiring picture. they just see the negative side, the capitalist exploitation, and throw up their hands and give up
@packetcat yeah but i mean, you’re not taking an annual tech salary for moderating and maintaining the space, you’re just paying bills
suburban-ass motherfuckers talking about Mastodon like it’s a bad thing our communities aren’t bankrolled by anonymous benefactors
@kit i mean, three people were taking tech salaries to nominally work on it over the course of three years, but that doesn’t tell you how much work was actually done, or how much those three people could have accomplished in this space.
i mean, part of the problem with cohost is that it was never open source and could not take outside contributions. they very intentionally did limit how much energy could be spent on the platform. and people on cohost were mostly fine continuing using that closed-source solution until now instead of building an open-source one that could survive a budget shortfall, so?
a lot of MONEY went into cohost, but that’s a different matter
@kit how much effort actually did go into sustaining cohost?
Administrator / Public Relations for GlitchCat. Not actually glitchy, nor a cat. I wrote the rules for this instance.
“Constitutionally incapable of not going hard” — @aescling
“Fedi Cassandra” – @Satsuma
I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THINGS. YOU CAN JUST @ ME.
I work for a library but I post about Zelda fanfiction.
For the time being, this is mostly a mirror of <https://status.ladys.computer/>. Want to get in touch? E·mail me!