clodboy cowdsire @wallhackio@cat.family

seen in a thread discussing obscure c++ facts:

veggietales told me growing up that "God made you special".

but they were wrong.

God made only Daniel B special and the rest of us, are Not.

ea sports. its indie game

i am very glad that the word "dumpass" is now in my vocabulary

mmmmmmmm soup

anyway, this is a public service announcement that hellblade: senua's sacrifice is only $9 right now

extremely close to wasting more money on another excellent steam deal for a game i might never play

i am software egineer

Imagine if it snowed in the middle of April haha that would be crazy lmao

_=s=>(s=s[0].toUpperCase()+s.slice(1).toLowerCase(),\`${s}${s.at(-1)=='y'?'':'y'} Mc${s.replace(/(ey|y)$/,'')}face\`) is much better way to do what i did, but the javascript in the reply to the stackexchange post is 19 characters shorter

FUCK there is a much better solution in the comments

just got nerd sniped very hard by https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/160438/facey-mcfaceface:

@Lady as a former physicist I think I have no choice but to agree

Starting to realize that @Lady thinks math majors are useless

Coworker: I like to call Groovy "half-assed Java". Is that a mean thing to say?

Senior Dev: Actually, it's a superset of Java so it's double-ass.

Shouts out to the c program which draws a circle in ASCII art in a comment and calculates pi by reflexively parsing its own source code

This took an infuriating amount of time to debug

Groovy is supposed to be a superset of Java but there are situations where that isn't true. For one thing, the syntax which initializes an array in Java ({ 1, 2, 3 }) is syntactically ambiguous with something groovy made up called "closures" that I am not going to explain, but only if the array has a single element. If there are multiple elements the syntax is not ambiguous and things are fine

Because of this I passed a closure to something written in Java that expected an array of strings BUT IT DID NOT THROW AN EXCEPTION???????