Bumby the Loaf @wallhackio@cat.family
i go by Clodsire, Clodboy and Catwin.
videogame enjoyer. mathematics hobbyist and recovering physicist. software engineer. professional wonk. prophet of The Truth. the walking embodiment of "not diagnosed, but somethings wrong". i like animals that wear cowboy hats.
number of fat cock awards received: 56
header is by @vaporeon_
"i regret ever allowing him here" ~aescling
"oh you're one of those weird movie likers" ~Ti
"the thing you need to understand about @wallhackio is that he is utterly sick in the head. this is partially a compliment. but not entirely" ~aescling
28+
he/him
Joined Nov 2022
@hoja sorry they would name such a thing after you
@hoja what is citrus
@hoja write it coward
@coriander @holly oh you meant the ninja turtle. yeah im way smarter than him
@coriander @holly who the FUCK is da vinki
@holly @coriander what if we changed it to "art is never finished, only set free"
Bumby the Loaf
boosted
Well I've finished my first ever complete song that I thought was worth putting out in the world and here it is.
Bumby the Loaf
boosted
Apparently the tallest fastest longest rollercoaster is in Saudi Arabia now
@coriander I boosted this before the image even finished loading on my screen
Bumby the Loaf
boosted
Bumby the Loaf
boosted
☭
Bumby the Loaf
boosted
POV: you are a nice crusty baguette on the kitchen counter and i want to make a sandwich at 1:47 a.m.
Bumby the Loaf
boosted
re: c++ complaining, wall of text
@aescling again I return to the statement "reinterpret_cast<T&>(x) is the same thing as *reinterpret_cast<T*>(&x)"
A reinterpret cast to a reference type is equivalent to a dereferenced reinterpret cast of a pointer. It is very explicitly not a pointer.
re: c++ complaining, wall of text
@aescling again I return to the statement "reinterpret_cast<T&>(x) is the same thing as *reinterpret_cast<T*>(&x)"
A reinterpret cast to a reference type is equivalent to a deferenced reinterpret cast of a pointer. It is very explicitly not a pointer.
re: c++ complaining, wall of text
@aescling you are right, you can only reinterpret cast to a char pointer or reference. i was mistaken about the existence of reinterpret casts to char
I don't understand how the result is a char pointer. It is not. It is a char reference. References are aliases. They are like macros to the original thing. They aren't a number representing a location in memory. They are another name for the variable itself
re: c++ complaining, wall of text
@aescling according to this stackexchange answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/5924278/22334683
"reinterpret_cast<T&>(x) is the same thing as *reinterpret_cast<T*>(&x)"
i go by Clodsire, Clodboy and Catwin.
videogame enjoyer. mathematics hobbyist and recovering physicist. software engineer. professional wonk. prophet of The Truth. the walking embodiment of "not diagnosed, but somethings wrong". i like animals that wear cowboy hats.
number of fat cock awards received: 56
header is by @vaporeon_
"i regret ever allowing him here" ~aescling
"oh you're one of those weird movie likers" ~Ti
"the thing you need to understand about @wallhackio is that he is utterly sick in the head. this is partially a compliment. but not entirely" ~aescling
28+
he/him
Joined Nov 2022
