æʃliŋ, loaf of autismo @aescling@cat.family

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ blocks are also statements iirc

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio you can purrobably do cool nasty hacks with them since the labeled statement can seemingly just be an arbitrary code block

label1: {
    // ...
}

but idk it seems a bit limited

@vaporeon_ kind of but not really

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ to be clear the one liner was not remotely a serious suggestion, it'd be terrible

@vaporeon_ @alas @wallhackio but anyway, if you wrote a loop ending in i++ in the body, my furst thought would be “this is a for loop”

@vaporeon_ @alas @wallhackio you dropped the i increment

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ i bet you could write this loop in the form for (; [nasty conditional]; i++) { }, which would be the funniest option

@coriander you must be there
you’re my Walterwhere

@vaporeon_ i wonder if this is the html sanitizer as opposed to the markdown purrocessor

@vaporeon_ oh no it strips it

@vaporeon_ i think it renders it as literal text but we can just test that

@packetcat huh

@N33R a pun so awful (affectionate) i could only begrudgingly favourite the post

@vaporeon_ okay i should be more precise. the extent to which there is a client in GtS, you cannot actually interact with the fediverse in any way with it. it’s there to satisfy the expectation that the instance should have things like about pages and purrmalinks fur profiles and (public*) posts

* iirc it does not have purrmalinks fur unlisted posts, a deliberate change from mastodon’s behavior. i do not know why

@vaporeon_ there’s no client built into GTS

also, mornyawn . @clock, do your thing

@vaporeon_ …as in skateboarding???

@vaporeon_ normal, but not in size