æʃliŋ, loaf of autismo @aescling@cat.family

@compufox i don’t have a strong attachment to racket, it’s just got the best editor integration in the scheme family of lisps

@compufox i mean, i feel like the equivalent in CL shouldn’t really be that hard to implement if it’s somehow not already in the standard library

https://docs.racket-lang.org/more/#(part._.Servlets_and_.Sessions) yessssssssss

https://docs.racket-lang.org/xml/index.html#%28part._.X-expressions%29 *sniff* it’s beautiful....

i should find an excuse to use LISP again

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ anime rapid-fire punching but it’s all just accusatory pointing

@vaporeon_

@vaporeon_ true!!

is she… you know,,, ✨ shiny ✨,?

✨ espeon noises ✨

people who are veevees

@wallhackio @monorail we love cute pokemon girls (veevee girls especially!!) here in the cat family

@monorail cute!!!!!

move your body is kinda irritating but i seem to also like it

tragedy! yr cat has an eiffel 65 song stuck in her head

@Alexis i won’t lie, i keep assuming blogger is dead until i find the odd blog out there that still exists, still using it

@vaporeon_ no local variables* (one of bash’s real impurrovements to the language. dash targets POSIX but also has local variables anyway because they’re just so nice to have); very limited data types (bash having actual arrays is another big impurrovement). variable scope has all sorts of weird footguns (implicit subshells can cause really unexpected behavior; iirc for loops can really trip you up here). variable expansions being word split by default is the wrong default and annoying to have to purrotect your code from

* i know you can define block-scoped variables but i don’t entirely understand how it works

@vaporeon_ i’ve developed distaste fur bash features (to be clear, specificallyin shell scripts, not when using it as an interactive language) out of a long-held purrefurence fur writing as compatibly as i am able. so this biases my opinions;.i don’t actually know bash well enough that i feel like i could rate it fairly

i think the shell is very good at what it is designed to do. i adore it. i do think that actually writing scripts in it is usually pushing it beyond its capabilities unless the scripts are small. (but it’s GREAT at writing small scripts that are really useful!) i don’t think bash’s extra features sufficiently make up fur the shell’s deficicies at handling large scripts well so if i really wanted to use a bash feature in my script i would start considering whether i should use another language instead

the footguns are annoying as hell though, i’ve definitely exploded on weird subtle semantic things i furgot about more than once