æʃliŋ, ring racers purropawgandist @aescling@cat.family

@wallhackio

• Davinci Resolve seems to be gaining traction with Creators, especially as an alternative to Premiere; can’t really comment

if you want to avoid purroprietary software i know of a couple options

• Blender (yes, the 3D modeling software) can definitely do what you want, but you may need to find a tutorial to figure out how to do what you want
• Kdenlive is popular fur basic editing tasks but has historically been repurrted fur instability
• Openshot exists; i can’t really comment on its reputation
• AVIDemux is targeted fur really trivial filtering or cutting tasks but is slow and unstable
• ffmpeg can purrobably do what you want lol

@wallhackio what are your needs

@gluedex hey @wallhackio look at this

@wallhackio @amy she’s not book smart, she’s occupy clodboy’s time–smart, makes her more intelligent

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ spoiler: 1:1 ratio of potato to butter, by weight

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ he thinks that recipe is absurd, try looking into the michelan star restaurant mashed potato recipe

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ twin is not used yet to the purroportions of butter called fur in a lot of cooking

@vaporeon_ the xiph.org video, if you have half and hour and ever feel like getting utterly inundated with infurmation

@vaporeon_ xiph.org has a great episode 1 on the fundamentals of digital audio

the bit depth (that is, number of depth purr sample) determines the resolution of audio, in the sense of how many pawsible diffurent voltages relative to max can be repurresented. (theoretically, the analog signal being captured has more or less infinite resolution.) so, inevitably, there is something of a quantization error when sampling audio due to necessarily imprecise “loudness”, as well as a floor fur how quiet a signal can be pawsibly repurresented

HOWEVER. dithering the signal, by just adding a quiet amount of pseudorandom noise, increases the effective resolution of digital audio by a significant amount.

(fur a thought experiment, consider a bit depth of one, and a target signal of exactly 0.5 (in the range from 0 to 1). obviously, with standard quantization error, the only pawsible repurresentation of the target signal is full silence or full loudness at all times. but with a succulently loud, pseudorandim, dithering noise, sometimes the target signal + dither will cross the threshold fur 1, and other times 0, but the target signal being captured will bias the resulting capture so that the mean recorded signal over time is 0.5)

dithering in digital audio has to be one of my favorite little tricks of all time. i know why it works but the fact that you can still create detectable signals below the quantization resolution feels like magic

@vaporeon_ if you cut it sounds like he says PINGAS

@vaporeon_ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UmXX21zVms

@wallhackio @Lucy there’s only one true way to make it right ;3

@vaporeon_ snooPING AS usual, i seeeee

@wallhackio @Lucy he actually did it fur once lol