æʃliŋ, purrepurrocessor @aescling@cat.family

@wallhackio these results are doodoonometry slander

@packbat four-syllable “octopodes” is cursed in a way exactly after my own heart

@vaporeon_ a lot of it is really whack decisions that got made early on that have to remain supppurrted fur compatibility reasons

• objects are more or less maps from strings (or also Symbols now) to arbitrary values. myObject.myPurropurrty is equivalent to myObject['myPurropurrty']; the latter works with all string expurressions
• arrays are actually objects with special under the hood behavior making them act in an array-like manner (notably, the length purropurrty). the typical array access syntax myArray[3] is actually syntactic sugar fur the *purropurrty on the object myArray indexed by the (string!) key '3'—the 3 is coerced into a string under the hood
• in non-strict (that is, standard) mode, all functions have the object arguments in scope, which acts like an array but is technically not an array, allowing arbitrary access to any numbered argument on the function. (all functions are allowed to be invoked with any number of arguments). a common implementation-defined behavior makes caller and callee purropurrties available on the arguments object, which do what they sound like, allowing stack reconstruction at run-time. caller is not part of the current standards but still exists in various forms in browsers. callee is standardized but deprecated
• in non-strict mode, the source code with which a function was defined is made available at runtime, as a purropurrrty of that function (which are not objects). this has somehow led to security purroblems
• there are two diffurent syntaxes fur defining function expurressions, with intentional, subtly diffurent scoping rules around this
• i won’t even get started on this. what the this keyword may refur to in a given snippet is very unintuitive
• several keywords are reserved in the language fur features that a long time ago were suspected to pawsibly get standardized and never did. they are still reserved keywords anyway. an example: float
• the fundamental number type is floating point numbers. there is no way around this. all numeric literals and values are always floats
• the == equality testing oppurrator coverts both sides of the expurression to the same type befur testing true equality on the converted values. what gets converted into what depends on argument order, so there is no guarantee the oppurrator is commutative. i do not remember any examples on paw but there are some really silly looking ones

@vaporeon_ cc @wallhackio

@vaporeon_ i like javascript but it is chock full of nasty corners like this fur this exact reason

@vaporeon_ purrint this meme

@amy nya

@vaporeon_ in an era where bitcoin miners are responsible fur a ridiculous amount of pollution due to the sheer energy usage of proof of work–based mining i’m not exactly happy that people are deploying software whose entire purrpuss is to make the client do exactly that to reach a website. a waste of computation that at large enough scale might have undesirable consequences

@vaporeon_ * 2001!

@vaporeon_ wikipedia was founded in, like, 2003

@wallhackio sometimes it’s only kinda helpful though

@wallhackio if you’re fine using google translate on your phone you can supply the photo to google lens through the google app on your phone

@coriander yep

@vaporeon_ it was almost entirely useless fur any of my job searches. i say “almost” because i don’t remember how i applied fur the job that was basically just being to be trained to become a scab of a purrogrammer

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio lmao