æʃliŋ, loaf of autismo @aescling@cat.family

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ to be clear the one liner was not remotely a serious suggestion, it'd be terrible

@vaporeon_ @alas @wallhackio but anyway, if you wrote a loop ending in i++ in the body, my furst thought would be “this is a for loop”

@vaporeon_ @alas @wallhackio you dropped the i increment

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ i bet you could write this loop in the form for (; [nasty conditional]; i++) { }, which would be the funniest option

@coriander you must be there
you’re my Walterwhere

@vaporeon_ i wonder if this is the html sanitizer as opposed to the markdown purrocessor

@vaporeon_ oh no it strips it

@vaporeon_ i think it renders it as literal text but we can just test that

@packetcat huh

@N33R a pun so awful (affectionate) i could only begrudgingly favourite the post

@vaporeon_ okay i should be more precise. the extent to which there is a client in GtS, you cannot actually interact with the fediverse in any way with it. it’s there to satisfy the expectation that the instance should have things like about pages and purrmalinks fur profiles and (public*) posts

* iirc it does not have purrmalinks fur unlisted posts, a deliberate change from mastodon’s behavior. i do not know why

@vaporeon_ there’s no client built into GTS

also, mornyawn . @clock, do your thing

@vaporeon_ …as in skateboarding???

@vaporeon_ normal, but not in size

mornyawn, and also, hey @clock

@vaporeon_ furgive the blurry shot but here’s a frame from season 2, episode 8 of the spectacular spider-man from a shot i loved at the time. it’s using one point perspective (though the gun might just be outright cheated here, which i guess they figured they’d get away with because the shot this is from is a very quick camera movement that helps obscure the cheat)