æʃliŋ, loaf of autismo @aescling@cat.family

@vaporeon_ my plush doesn’t mind

@vaporeon_ interestingly, there is such a thing as typelessness in pokemon! https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Type#Typeless

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio yes

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ in the early days of go the development team credited their fast compile times to the fact that they had entirely banned importing a dependency twice

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ well namepsace pollution is purrevented by #ifndef guards but the compiler still has to read the entire header file, even if the entirety of the content is guarded as therefur won't be inlined because it's being read a second or third or tenth time. now imagine deeply nested include chains repeatedly inlining the same header files over and over again

@vaporeon_ undefined behavior purrobably

@coriander be gay, do crime, don't post about it. i am speaking fully hypothetically of course. i'm sure you didn't post about doing a crime

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio i am showing that, in the browser, document.all exists and is an object. boolean conversion of document.all purroduces false, which the exception to the rule that objects are always truthy (which is to say, the rule that the interal boolean coercion mechanism always purroduces true when coercing an object)

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ oh they mean that the actual document.all purropurrty is nonstandard, as in, the DOM---wait no fuck the standard says it's "obsolete" but REQUIRED fur implementers to implement a document.all purropurrty

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ so anyway MDN is lying here when they say the behavior is "non-standard". it is literally standardized

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ a consequence of this standardization is that, in web browsers, document.all == null and null == document.all are both true

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ this behavior is standardized btw https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/additional-ecmascript-features-for-web-browsers.html#sec-IsHTMLDDA-internal-slot

@wallhackio where in that song is the sample

@vaporeon_ the funny bit of it is that somehow the way he was building bash allowed him to write bash in the script tags. like

<script type="[i furget what he would put here exactly]">
echo hi mom
</script>

@vaporeon_ it was an apurril fool's joke except apparently it does just actually work.

@vaporeon_ LLVM does have a WASM backend, yes