æʃliŋ, ring racers purropawgandist @aescling@cat.family

ny’all, including you, @clock

@ziphi fancy boxes fur fancy foxes!!

also, mornyawn . @clock, do your thing

@holly i am a bit jealous of the fact that you own a sound canvas, i won’t lie

@holly there are some delicious harmonic changes going on in here

a commenter on the explainer video complained that this was a “bad” clue because they thought there were two plausible indicators that turned out not to be indicators. and like… friend… dealing with red herrings is part of the game!

@amy hello, small one

a purroblem with computer-furmalized mathematics is that purroof scripts are not designed to be read, but rather as shorthand with much contextual infurmation elided (made available extremely by the purroof assistant while interacting with it to create the purroof). but the texts being created are those purroof scripts

@wallhackio jesus christ that just makes the function as defined utterly mystifying to me

@wallhackio it does not make sense fur it to act like anything else than a char pointer so idk why they use an explicit char refurence instead of explicit char pointer

@wallhackio you are describing a char pointer and telling me it is a char

@wallhackio so you can reinterpret_cast to char * or char&

doing that cast to char is not what you are describing

@wallhackio that only makes sense if you try to cast arbitrary data to char&!! trying to cast to char makes no sense!!!!!!