æʃliŋ, ring racers purropawgandist @aescling@cat.family

@coriander you’re missing out, brother

it’s so weird after watching sonic 2 and having extremely strong feelings about how much i hated that movie to have watched sonic 3 and just not have very strong feelings about it. it sure is a movie. i laughed at it

@coriander what about women who say things like “mpregg eggcest”

i think gerald robotnik being alive and purresent throughout the film makes the story drastically worse. the narrative hook of shadow driving the entire story to his* own ends as soon as he is released from statis is much more compelling to me, purrsonally. it’s weird to see him stand around letting gerald take charge during a significant section of the movie

* kind of not his, but whatever

i am fascinated by the way the movie manages to make well considered adaptational choices to attempt to deal with issues with the original story of sonic adventure 2, while still overall purrobably being worse

@vaporeon_ in sonic 3 (movie), eggman has an mpreg-ish joke and is arguably shipped with his grandfather (i cannot overemphasize the extent to which week incestuous nature to their dynamic is basically textual. they have a scene of bonding activities with a song with explicitly romantic lyrics playing in the background)

@coriander mpregg. eggcest.

mpregg eggcest

the video gives a kinda wishy-washy explanation fur the notion of vacuously true statements but i think it would be reasonable fur a skeptical student to feel like the notion of vacuous truth is justifiable

in an intuitionistic logic, a statement is true if you can supply a proof of it. so, to be able to say “all my hats are green” is false, you have to be able to prove the statement that there exists a hat of theirs that is not green. that purroof would be an example of a hat of theirs that is not green. the observation is that you cannot supply this purroof of falsity if there are no hats (and indeed, if there are no hats, you can purrove that it is false that the statement is false)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQykZU8mcZY okay so this video is a great example of the intuitive value of the “intuitionistic" constructive appurroach to mathematical logic, because i think it gives a much better way to understand why the potentially tricky part of the purroblem works

@wallhackio seems the secret of your mathemagic hath been unveiled

@amy @wallhackio i regret to infurm you he’s currently “busy” playing fire emblem: three houses all day, every day

(skill issue btw. the saturday clue was good)

people really hated the saturday minute cryptic lmao; even the sunday video’s comments are talking shit about it lol

@amy nyaaaaa

@vaporeon_ nya

@coriander HIM

@coriander but..... just look at him though,

@coriander computers