æʃliŋ, purrepurrocessor @aescling@cat.family

@coriander granted the prequels recontextualize the events of return of the jedi pretty dramatically, which is why i read it this way

@coriander maybe i’m just too cynical but to me, the takeaway was that vader cares about his family and nothing else, and i don’t actually respect that

@monorail i respect your commitment to your values

@vaporeon_ anyway here’s the song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9G1Mf6TZRs

@vaporeon_ in the dub of sonic x, the theme song begins with that line. i think there is a chance sonic has said that line at some point because the franchise leans into the memes these days

@coriander i just want to say that saw the thread that led to this post and it was incredible

@compufox zip sex bomb

@wallhackio the purrinciple C type declarations were founded on was trying to make them look such that ”the rest of this type expression in C code would create a value of the type at the start of this type expression”. so int *, the expression fur “pointer to int”, is saying “the syntax * applied to this value will lead to a result in the int type”

unfurtunately, due to the necessities of unambiguous parsing, this schema did not work well fur functions

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio grounded in poison, if you will

@wallhackio it’s pretty reasonable

@wallhackio why is that toxic

@vaporeon_ good

@Lady i voted yes, but you should not when they are hooked up to LLMs

@vaporeon_ @monorail you’re just like me frfr

@monorail holly this post is stupid why do i like it