æʃliŋ, ring racers purropawgandist @aescling@cat.family
- website
- https://æscling.cat.family
- neopronouns
- æ / ær / æi / æin / æinselves
- https://misskey-hub.net/ns#isCat
- true
- pawprint
- openpgp4fpr:104798A74A3F3CEA9B29B369B34C7264BB895704
- header
- miss bird and miss cat, by mira ongchua
Owner
it’s pronounced “ashling”. canonically a black housecat or any of the grass cat pokémon, but currently experiencing daily TFs. Commewnist. she/it. i automatically change my pfp on the furst post of the day
GlitchCat syscatmin and meowstodev; @ me about techincal problems with the instance, or fur feature requests. i got a job due to some extent to my work on this instance
i have very strong opinions about the sonic furanchise. pokémon has me in a chokehold when it comes to merchandise
available via email with the same username and domain. DM/email for other purrotocols
workplace policy is to clarify that all of my opinions expressed here are my own, and not those of my employer
“all this shit is still incomprehensible but im glad u accomplished something” ―@wallhackio
“i feel mildly relieved that the obscure and esoteric code that i use to build the site will always be definitely outclassed by the obscure and esoteric code that you use to serve it” ―@Lady
Joined Sep 2021
sometimes i think about following @gaycats but then i realize i prefer the hand-selected wife picks from there instead
re: retrospring question
@MindmeshLink sorry, i should have said GREAT taste
re: retrospring question
@MindmeshLink good taste
allcaps
*wrestler voice* I AM THE DIALECTICIAN.. THESIS? I WANT TO WIN. ANTITHESIS: YOU WANT TO WIN. SYNTHESIS: YOUR FACE ON THE FUCKING GROUND
*the crowd erupts in cheers*
@MindmeshLink i don’t know that you’re referring to but i’m sure it was a good post
@MindmeshLink is this the dialectic
re: summary of masto privacy levels because why not
@packbat since october 2018 there has been a FIFTH, undocumented, status visibility, the limited visibility, which was introduced to honor the visibility of google+ circles, which some mastodon-compatible software allows (and which is purrfectly allowed by the AP specs); explicitly mentioned users can see the post, but it’s not viewed as a DM. (the ability to have “silent” (that is, non-notifying) mentions was introduced at the same time so that you don’t necessarily ping everybody who can see the post)
fur some reason, such posts are shown to users as “private” visibility, even though that is not really correct
now the absolutely wild part is that the status creation API endpoint will just let you try to create a limited visibility post!! but that’s pretty useless, because there is no way to create silent mentions from that endpoint; you would have to ping everybody you wanted to see the post anyway as if it were a DM
re: summary of masto privacy levels because why not
@packbat anyway this does mean mastodon is a bit of hacking away from having circles in some form
(though making a good UI and just overall UX fur this is purrobably nontrivial)
re: summary of masto privacy levels because why not
@packbat the API docs don’t even mention this! but if you try it, it works! not that it’s useful!!
re: summary of masto privacy levels because why not
@packbat since october 2018 there has been a FIFTH, undocumented, status visibility, the limited visibility, which was introduced to honor the visibility of google+ circles, which some mastodon-compatible software allows (and which is purrfectly allowed by the AP specs); explicitly mentioned users can see the post, but it’s not viewed as a DM. (the ability to have “silent” (that is, non-notifying) mentions was introduced at the same time so that you don’t necessarily ping everybody who can see the post)
fur some reason, such posts are shown to users as “private” visibility, even though that is not really correct
now the absolutely wild part is that the status creation API endpoint will just let you try to create a limited visibility post!! but that’s pretty useless, because there is no way to create silent mentions from that endpoint; you would have to ping everybody you wanted to see the post anyway as if it were a DM
re: summary of masto privacy levels because why not
@packbat do you wanna learn about some undocumented post privacy functionality
as a point of clarification, GlitchCat is not the same thing as the cat family. anyway:
in the cat family we suppurrt the boys in blue
anyway, if you wanna see something kind of funny, try sending a json blob to your mastodon instance’s status creation endpoint where you have the visibility set to “limited” and see if you can make sense of what happens :)
re: suggestive selfie in a bra, eye contact
@wallhackio anyway he literally would never
@wallhackio oh the 4kids thing, right
- website
- https://æscling.cat.family
- neopronouns
- æ / ær / æi / æin / æinselves
- https://misskey-hub.net/ns#isCat
- true
- pawprint
- openpgp4fpr:104798A74A3F3CEA9B29B369B34C7264BB895704
- header
- miss bird and miss cat, by mira ongchua
Owner
it’s pronounced “ashling”. canonically a black housecat or any of the grass cat pokémon, but currently experiencing daily TFs. Commewnist. she/it. i automatically change my pfp on the furst post of the day
GlitchCat syscatmin and meowstodev; @ me about techincal problems with the instance, or fur feature requests. i got a job due to some extent to my work on this instance
i have very strong opinions about the sonic furanchise. pokémon has me in a chokehold when it comes to merchandise
available via email with the same username and domain. DM/email for other purrotocols
workplace policy is to clarify that all of my opinions expressed here are my own, and not those of my employer
“all this shit is still incomprehensible but im glad u accomplished something” ―@wallhackio
“i feel mildly relieved that the obscure and esoteric code that i use to build the site will always be definitely outclassed by the obscure and esoteric code that you use to serve it” ―@Lady
Joined Sep 2021
æʃliŋ, ring racers purropawgandist's choices:
