Satsuma @Satsuma@cat.family

@twistylittlepassages !!!! we’re supposed to get one day in the 60s tomorrow, but it’ll be accompanied by all day rain so probably no open windows here

@soph_sol so annoying!

@stelepami @pagrus i def heard the immunity theory a ton earlier on, mostly from people who never resumed masking even after it became excruciatingly clear the logic was faulty

@bluedreaming yeah i doubt the comm itself will want to rename, but if anyones thinking of starting a sister comm, thats where they’d be

@bluedreaming paradisediner or kpop_fic are probably your best bet if you’re looking to find someone interested in taking custody of the name

@kiesa a decided improvement!

@Forestofglory @Betty or prototypical?

@autumn @twistylittlepassages @maya boomers/older gen x downsizing are *also* currently dominating the market for smaller homes—the eg of the median repeat homebuyer is up to 58, & first time home buyers currently make up less than a third of the market: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/america-s-homebuyers-are-getting-older/ar-AA1kdYwC

Ironically, that article attributes the lack of adults with children buying homes to the declining birthrate, rather than the difficulty getting a home as a young prospective parent encouraging people to delay / not have kids

@Betty i assumed that her at least heavily implying he was illegitimate was part of the scandal, yeah and that it only works bc Jin Guangyao is trying his hardest to convince Jin Guangshan that yeah he *definitely* doesn’t have any legitimate heirs, nope, but hasn’t he, Jin Guangyao, been soooo helpful?

@ryfulets @Betty au where Jiang Yanli scandalously leaves the Jins to go raise Jin Ling as heir to the Jiang sect after her husbands death

JGY is initially like “sweet this vastly simplified my path to being sect leader” but later comes to have Regrets

@thalassa oh thats irritating!

@pixelcats @yesterdaychild i used to have “get my tabs under control” as a weekly to do list item every tuesday 😅

i should probably start that up again tbh, they’ve been really accumulating lately

@thalassa the thing thats really bothering me tho is why would one person/group use two totally unrelated methods of manipulating the results? If you’re going to the trouble of manipulating the results to drop certain titles off the list, why then go for the much more obvious “ineligible” marker for other titles?

@thalassa and also there was nothing stopping the *American* committee members from just coming out and saying something if they wanted the irregularities to be caught

exurbe has been writing about how censors historically generally wanted to be obvious in a show of power, which is def an interesting angle to consider: https://www.exurbe.com/tools-for-thinking-about-censorship/

I’m not sure it entirely lines up with what I’ve seen of China’s censorship (which puts a lot of emphasis on reviewing materials before release so doesn’t have to deal with so much of the “how do you track down every copy of every banned book?”) but then again…they do seem oddly fine with shows using terrible obvious dubs over censored words/lines so a lack of subtlety doesn’t seem to bother them much at the v least