@amy @alyssa *Russell’s paradox voice* does the set of all things that are their own opposites contain itself?

@aescling @alyssa Ummmmmm true. I'm going with true. Not really fair, though, I think I've hard this one before

@amy @alyssa i’d have to think about this one a lot tbh

@aescling @alyssa I'm doing a Wheatley Portal2 joke tbf

@aescling @alyssa I don't remember the actual wording though

@amy @alyssa i have never played portal 2

@aescling @alyssa You could

@amy @aescling i've heard it's a good game. and based on the first one it probably is

@aescling @amy i'm sorry cat but that doesn't work.

supposing the set of all things that are their own opposites is its own opposite, then it contains itself, easy, simple, no paradox.

supposing the set of all things that are their own opposites is not its own opposite, then it doesn't contain itself. easy, simple, no paradox.

@aescling @amy this is not a russell's paradox situation

@alyssa @amy i didn’t think so, but i do think whatever the actual answer to the question is, is interesting enough to try to figure out