re: pendantic terminology question
@wallhackio what do you mean by this response?
re: pendantic terminology question
@wallhackio compilers don’t have runtimes?
re: pendantic terminology question
@aescling this specific use case does not guarantee that an exception is thrown by the compiler runtime. (it could be how the compiler is chosen to run but who knows? what if the compiler is written in a language without exceptions?) it is a compiler refusing to compile because the code is errant. that is not an exception that is just program behavior
re: pendantic terminology question
@wallhackio what if the implementation throws runtime exceptions as the most convenient way of short-circuiting on discovering an error?
re: pendantic terminology question
@wallhackio (which is to say, you think that? because, pedantically speaking, compilers have runtimes, and can absol-utely throw exceptions during that runtime)
re: pendantic terminology question
@aescling an error/exception is thrown at runtime. you cant throw an error during compilation its a non-sequitor