mr. nathan j. robinson have you considered a materialist approach to praxis instead of one founded on idealism and public discourse; what are your thoughts about that

my actual take regarding mr. nathan j. robinson’s points is that all of the best free content on the internet comes not from journalists but from people who are actually employed in doing the things they are writing about, who are getting paid for doing the things they are writing about, and who are writing about them in their free time above and beyond the thing that they are being paid to do

my disappointment is that mr. nathan j. robinson does not seem to even recognize that such people and writings exist

i think that maybe if mr. nathan j. robinson had spent more time listening to people who were actually working and doing the things they were talking about, then perhaps mr. nathan j. robinson could have avoided what he has called « internal dysfunction and tension, of the kind experienced by many young organizations without clear structure » by learning from the mistakes of those who came before