doing things that make me feel gross
(it's
let i = 0;
for (; i<matches[0].length; i++) {
const idx = i + currentSignal.length;
if (matches[0][idx] !== matches[matches.length-1][idx]) break;
}
)
@monorail I think a while loop would be better but I'm not sure I would give enough of a shit in a code review because either way would look Weird
@monorail here's my final answer:
let i = 0;
for (
let idx = currentSignal.length;
i < matches[0].length && matches[0][idx] === matches.at(-1)[idx];
idx += i++
);
@monorail probably should be ++i. oh well!
@wallhackio @monorail idx should increment by 1 which is not what either of those would do
☭
@wallhackio @aescling @monorail Can you do something like idx++, i++?
@vaporeon_ @aescling @monorail yeah that's what i would do (actually I would do ++idx, ++i but it objectively doesn't matter)
@vaporeon_ @aescling @monorail also this thread makes me certain that "I'm not sure I would give enough of a shit in a code review because either way would look Weird" was the right answer all along
@wallhackio @vaporeon_ @aescling mr. wallhackio do you like my javascript https://git.hollymcfarland.com/monorail/DSCRTC/src/branch/main/dscrtc.user.js#bypass=true
@monorail @vaporeon_ @aescling my only note is to use matches.at(-1) instead of matches[matches.length-1] at line 53 but even so, your javascript is clod-approved 
@wallhackio @vaporeon_ @aescling hooray hooray
i might fix that if i ever commit to this repo again