@monorail hmmmmmmm

@monorail I think a while loop would be better but I'm not sure I would give enough of a shit in a code review because either way would look Weird

@monorail here's my final answer:

let i = 0;
for (
  let idx = currentSignal.length;
  i < matches[0].length && matches[0][idx] === matches.at(-1)[idx];
  idx += i++
);

@monorail probably should be ++i. oh well!

@wallhackio @monorail idx should increment by 1 which is not what either of those would do

@aescling @monorail it would increment by 1 with idx += ++i.

@wallhackio @monorail no.

@aescling @monorail oh you're so right actually looooooooooooooooooooooool

@wallhackio @aescling @monorail Can you do something like idx++, i++?

@vaporeon_ @aescling @monorail yeah that's what i would do (actually I would do ++idx, ++i but it objectively doesn't matter)

@vaporeon_ @aescling @monorail also this thread makes me certain that "I'm not sure I would give enough of a shit in a code review because either way would look Weird" was the right answer all along

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ @aescling mr. wallhackio do you like my javascript https://git.hollymcfarland.com/monorail/DSCRTC/src/branch/main/dscrtc.user.js#bypass=true

@monorail @vaporeon_ @aescling ooooh yummy delicious iife ​​

@wallhackio @vaporeon_ @aescling this is convention for userscripts you see

@monorail @vaporeon_ @aescling I will support iife usage even if its stupid, iifes give me life

@wallhackio @monorail @vaporeon_ please tell me you OiI’d that Iife

@wallhackio @monorail @vaporeon_ he didn’t :c