Lady, EVOLVED 
wake up babe new static site generator dropped
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
(it may not work on Linux; i might have used an incompatible option for `touch´)
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
first commit of the new year
https://git.ladys.computer/Shushe/commitdiff/ec88b220b74e7a92e727a104be39c7b4a6b03dc1
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@Lady damn i can’t believe it was an entire year befur you posted any more prrgrrming
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@aescling damn i can't believe i’ve been working on this for two whole years
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@Lady feels weird to see make install used in this way but i guess it’s not exactly unreasonable
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@Lady like idk i'd just make the default make target be building the website into the default output folder but this is the least impurrtant issue i could pawsibly take with the thing
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@aescling i agree but did it anyway
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@Lady lol
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
@aescling the default behaviour (of printing a help dialog) is especially funny considering that the makefile still rebuilds and restarts itself twice to get there
@Lady Oh, that's cool!
re: wake up babe new static site generator dropped
this is very much just a minimum viable implementation right now; there’s more to add but this WORKS