Just encountered a Wikipedia article with a template at the top saying parts of the article look like they are LLM generated, and it *is* a bad article in addition to that, it's not only bad because of the AI-generated stuff, but just..... ugh can we not keep anything LLM-free? Can Wikipedia please have a no-LLMs policy? 😭 But yeah it's a totally useless article.
Follow
@cassolotl my understanding is that wikipedia DOES have an anti LLM policy and that header is applied to articles they havent had a chance to fix yet
@Satsuma I went looking and found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Large_language_models Which suggests that LLMs aren't automatically forbidden. But you're not the first person to say this to me, so I'm wondering if I'm missing something obvious somewhere?