🐊
I think we could get more people on board with political re-education if we just called it all sensitivity training
@coriander the term sensitivity training implies that it is workplace-based which is probably accurate to how such a thing would need to be implemented in the united states
especially assuming Not Immediate Magical Full State Communism, building communist workplaces, requiring workers to be educated in and follow communist principles in their work lives, and requiring that people who don't abide by those principles suffer workplace penalties (with ready access to training for correcting behaviour) is probably the most expedient way to get lots of people introduced to the necessary concepts quickly
@coriander i'm sure there are people who lost their jobs over the jan 6 bullshit who would be happy to participate in an educational thingy if it meant a guarantee of stable work yk? that's not an option for them here; once people are marred politically in the u.s. there is no path towards correction, even in cases where the people themselves might be completely willing
@Lady Yeah, that's the issue, right? There are a lot of people pretty far to the right who AREN'T an entirely-lost cause and I think we owe it to them as well as ourselves to find a good way to reach out to them and get them to change their minds, both on an individual and a systemic level. And if the systemic level requires something that people would call political re-education, I think that's still better than the alternative.
@coriander yes i think it's an issue of our time because historically, the problem was simpler and easier, and things like public debate and free speech and critical press and so forth were “good enough” tools for “most” people, because the channels of information were such that everybody would more or less get exposed to things regardless, and so community consensus could generally be formed through these channels
(nevermind that these channels were largely used to promote capitalism; a socialist community hypothetically could equally have achieved socialist consensus [if it weren't for those pesky kids and their CIA plant])
however now not ONLY is there an easier time for bad information to be widely consumed, but also there is much LESS guarantee that actually good information will reach people. the mechanisms of public debate and free speech yada yada can no longer make that guarantee
so the question becomes like, what can be done? other than both restricting people's access to bad information streams AND mandating their exposure to good ones, how do you give people a path towards a different (and more accurate) perspective on the world? but on a societal scale, that is censorship and state-sponsored media, and on an individual level, that is effectively a reeducation program, however you want to label it
@coriander this is also i think not as controversial as it sounds on the level of the people actually affected; like you listen to the people who are friends of people who have bought into the alt-right turn and they're like “idk i'm tired of all this bullshit i just want my friend back”
and that i think is the immediate question; how do we get people back to a place where they are engaging with their friends and communities in a way which is like, good. and that's also the desire of those friends and those communities
historically communism has been very as you have said top-down and heavy-handed but i think there is room for a community-oriented solution (and that that is very important whenever you are dealing with like, minority communities, to ensure you are correcting the right things and not just trying to wipe out people's culture)
