@vaporeon_ I would write it more clearly if it were something serious

@wallhackio By adding parentheses? Or splitting it across 2 lines?

@vaporeon_ if I were serious I would write it like
const max = (a, b, c) => a < b
? b < c
? c
: b
: a < c
? c
: a;
or I would use an if else for the "outer" condition so there is no nested ternary

@wallhackio That's too many lines, in my opinion

I would've written it like this:

const max = (a, b, c) => a < b ? (b < c ? c : b)                                
                               : (a < c ? c : a);

@vaporeon_ oh that reads nicely. cool style.

@wallhackio Let's do a poll to decide: Is this code easy to read and understand?

const max = (a, b, c) => a < b ? (b < c ? c : b)                                
                               : (a < c ? c : a);

@wallhackio (I hope there aren't any problems because of me editing the poll for clarity...)

@vaporeon_ @wallhackio it depends what you mean by "easy"

does it take a lot of effort to understand? no

but it does take some effort in a way that most single lines of code don't. if i come across this line while reading, i'm coming to a screeching halt while i slow down to inspect it closely for a moment

and even then, while it's not too bad to figure out what you think it does, if i have to verify its correctness? i'm going to have to spend some time and brainpower running through a couple cases to convince myself it does, in fact, do what you think it does

@monorail @vaporeon_ @wallhackio it's basically the equivalent of a sentence with too many parantheticals and/or em dashes