@alyssa I don't generally mentally distinguish in the slightest (between the meaning of the words themselves), but within New Urbanism (I'm... like 70% sure this is New Urbanism, and not some other movement) there is the concept of how "paved ways that cars can drive on" can be either "place where people enter and exit from houses and businesses, sometimes into cars" or "part of a path intended to get a car from end-of-path A (elsewhere from this paved section) to end-of-path B (also elsewhere)".
And they are very against the mixing of those two concepts, which leads to design that puts, e.g., a crosswalk between a school and a mall going across six lanes of traffic that normally go 40-50mph. They refer to that concept as a "stroad", a portmanteau of "street" and "road", which they use completely distinctly for those two distinct uses.
And that I remember off the top of my head. But I can usually never remember which is the "street" and which is the "road".
@alyssa I don't generally mentally distinguish in the slightest (between the meaning of the words themselves), but within New Urbanism (I'm... like 70% sure this is New Urbanism, and not some other movement) there is the concept of how "paved ways that cars can drive on" can be either "place where people enter and exit from houses and businesses, sometimes into cars" or "part of a path intended to get a car from end-of-path A (elsewhere from this paved section) to end-of-path B (also elsewhere)".
And they are very against the mixing of those two concepts, which leads to design that puts, e.g., a crosswalk between a school and a mall going across six lanes of traffic that normally go 40-50mph. They refer to that concept as a "stroad", a portmanteau of "street" and "road", which they use completely distinctly for those two distinct uses.
And that I remember off the top of my head.
But I can usually never remember which is the "street" and which is the "road".