would this be desirable to process as two mentions?...

sateohstau@kindle@plural.cafe

.@kindle

.@kindle
,@kindle
;@kindle
"@kindle
'@kindle
`@kindle
*@kindle
[@kindle
\@kindle
(@kindle
)@kindle
-@kindle
_@kindle@plural.cafe
?@kindle
!@kindle
@@kindle
#@kindle
$@kindle
%@kindle
^@kindle
&@kindle

/@kindle@plural.cafe

_.@kindle
<@kindle
>@kindle

https://example.org/.@kindle@plural.cafe

oh dear

@aescling I think it would, like "i bet @usera/@userb would be able to help with this"

@monorail interestingly enough the mention processing regexp specifies one punctuation mark that is not allowed to precede a mention, and it is /

probably becuase https :// domain/@user

@aescling hm

@monorail https :// glitch.cat.family/@aescling/108095166497359093 interestingly _ doenn’t scan and i’m gonna guess it’s because it’s considered “connecting punctuation” and therefore part of :word:, which is not allowed to immediately precede a mention

(my guess was right)