thinking about terrible anti-abortion argument, allusion to violence
@ljwrites legally (in the US at least, tho as far as i’m aware this is near-universal) if someone needs blood, or bone marrow, or a liver transplant or whatever and i am the only person in the entire world who can give it to them…i still get a choice about whether or not i want to donate part of my body to save their life. in fact, we think this right to bodily integrity is so important that it applies to dead people! being convicted of a crime does not (and very much should not) erase this right either
so if you take their comparison at face value, it actually favors legal and easily accessible abortions
thinking about terrible anti-abortion argument, allusion to violence
@ljwrites i do think this argument is incredibly telling of the authors underlying beliefs though—in order for the comparison to be relevant you have to accept that:
— that sex is morally wrong
— morally wrong acts should always be crimes, and therefore deserve punishment through the legal system
— that women’s rights to bodily integrity can/should be taken away
— that violence is an appropriate retribution for a crime
thinking about terrible anti-abortion argument, allusion to violence
@Satsuma yuuup basically the classic "sex wrong and women evil" thing with more steps.
thinking about terrible anti-abortion argument, allusion to violence
@Satsuma Yeah even accepting for the sake of argument the extremely ill-thought-out take that having an egg fertilized = near-deadly violence, the remedy to that in legal systems is paying damages or (in incarceral systems) jail time etc., not forced organ donation or blood donation.