Take spotted in the wild: fiat currencies are a religion because they're only worth "what the users collective belief in it is worth (sic)"

It's honestly not even correct about how value is assessed to any given monetary unit, to say NOTHING of how wrongly the concept of a religion is presented

It's not a religion, it's a basic part of the social contract PLEASE read literally any political theory before saying things, people

You don't even have to read Rousseau if you don't want to, it's okay, just read something